Backlink Badger helps you find where to place a backlink and check the requirements before you start.

The directory covers backlink opportunities for SEO, GEO and AI visibility specialists, founders, and content teams.

Compare each provider's requirements, costs, and risks to decide which ones are worth your time.

Why this exists

Backlink sourcing should be less performative

Backlink opportunities include profile links, marketplaces, publications with editorial review, and paid listings.

Backlink Badger puts those differences closer to the surface: what kind of link you can expect, how hard it is to get, whether there is a free path, and what might make the attempt a waste of time.

Find the path

Each provider should answer a practical question: where can a marketer, founder, or SEO operator actually place a link?

Surface the catch

Free does not always mean useful. Dofollow does not always mean safe. The directory calls out friction, moderation, cost, and risk.

Keep it sortable

Backlink value, spam score, difficulty, time, and link type help turn a long list into a short action plan.

Built for a stricter community list

Community submissions matter, but volume is not the scoreboard. A messy list helps nobody.

What belongs here

Providers with a clear backlink mechanism: profiles, directories, marketplaces, publications, product pages, resources, support pages, or contribution paths where a useful link can reasonably exist.

What gets challenged

Thin directories, unverifiable claims, suspicious paid placements, and anything that looks like it was built to sell link volume instead of creating a defensible citation.

How a row is built

Every provider row carries the same six signals

A row is only worth scanning if it answers the same questions for every provider. These are the fields behind each entry, shown here in the format they publish in. Every one is an editorial estimate, and every one carries its methodology on hover.

Link typeSet after checking whether the recommended backlink method on a provider typically outputs a dofollow link in the page HTML. Where attributes vary by page type, we use the realistic default and explain the nuance in the guide.
DofollowNofollow

Whether the recommended path typically outputs a link that can pass equity.

Backlink valueA 0-100 Backlink Badger editorial estimate of how much authority the page you would create actually carries: how strongly the platform links to and indexes that page type, and what comparable pages are worth in practice. Most new pages anywhere score low; a few platforms hand a fresh page real strength. A comparison number, not a live measurement.
0–100

Scored on the page you would actually create, not the provider’s homepage.

SpamSpam score where we have a defensible value for the relevant domain or surface, otherwise a conservative editorial estimate from platform quality and spam patterns. A comparison guide, not a guarantee.
0–100

Lower is better. Zero-padded so columns stay comparable at a glance.

DifficultyAssigned from editorial review of the recommended path. An approximate comparison estimate, not a measured metric.
0–100

Signup friction, content requirements, approval gates, and account trust.

TimeThe minimum minutes a prepared user needs end to end, including waiting steps we can reasonably predict. Your first attempt may take longer.
45m

Minutes a prepared user needs to sign up, set up, and publish.

CostMarked free when the recommended backlink path can be completed without paying the provider for access, placement, or a required plan. If only paid tiers unlock the link, it is marked paid.
FreePaid

Whether the recommended path can be completed without paying for access.

Backlinks are one signal, not the whole job

The directory does not pretend links solve content quality, relevance, technical SEO, or product-market fit. It helps with one job: finding backlink paths worth investigating. Within that job, three things decide whether a path is worth your afternoon.

Backlinks still matter
Search engines and AI answer systems both lean on public signals of authority, citation, and reputation.
Quality beats volume
A useful backlink path has relevance, editorial context, and a reasonable risk profile. A pile of weak links is busywork.
The details decide
Dofollow status, moderation, placement effort, and spam risk change whether a provider is worth trying.

Help keep the list useful

Suggest a provider or send a correction. Include screenshots if they help explain the submission steps or a problem with an entry.

Looking for information about why todoist.com and todoi.com are not the same thing?

Read the note